Copyediting
Recently a reader reported this “distracting issue” in A BRIDE FOR MARCUS”. (see on the right.)
It was a missing full stop (or period if you’re American.)
Okay it was a pretty small error, but a couple of readers had contacted me saying they’d spotted a few mistakes in that book (though they didn’t say what), so I went through the manuscript again, and found a couple more small mistakes. I fixed them and then reloaded the e-book. (I can’t change anything on the print version.) But it was easier to spot the mistakes this time as it had been a long time since I’d reread A Bride for Marcus.
Copyediting is harder than many people think, especially for authors. There are two main types of editing — developmental editing, which is editing for plot, characters, story etc. The second type is copyediting, which is editing for grammar and spelling, typos, missed words, characters whose eyes change color, and prose that’s awkward or confusing. (I blogged about editing before, if you’re interested.)
For me it’s the second type of editing that’s the hardest. My grammar is generally good, and so is my spelling (though I have to remember not to use Australian/English spelling for my books, since my main readership is in the USA. As well, my previous publisher was American, so I’m keeping the books consistent.)
But I’m a poor typist and I often make typos. Usually I spot them and correct them, but occasionally I’ll miss one or two. My trouble is, when I’ve finished writing a book, chances are I’ve also rewritten it or parts of it numerous times, and when it gets to that point, my brain sometimes reads what it thinks I’ve written, rather than what I’ve actually typed. Of course I’ll do a spell check. And Word flags words it thinks are wrong — BUT their suggestions are often wrong , sometimes badly wrong.
When I was traditionally published, my books passed through the eyes of an editor, a copyeditor (and then came back to me) and then a proofreader. Even so, mistakes still slipped through. The most memorable was with The Scoundrel’s Daughter. In it, I accidentally gave the Scottish nanny three different Mc names. I missed them, my editor missed them, the copyeditor missed them, and the proofreader, in the absolute final read-through, only picked up one of the three different names.
Luckily I’d sent the manuscript to my friend Mary Jo Putney who spotted the different names and told me, just in time for me to notify my editor — the book was to go to print the very next day!
For my self-published books, I’ve employed two different so-called copyeditors, but neither one did a good job. One even did a bad job, inserting words that were plain wrong without telling me! So I’ve had to do most of the copyediting myself, with the assistance of some friends who offered to read the books and pointed out the odd mistake — thank goodness.
I used to run every manuscript through a voice program, which read it back to me. That’s a great editing tool, and picks up all kinds of mistakes as well as word repetition and awkward phrasing. Unfortunately in the last update, the program now only reads back a paragraph at a time, which made it impossible. So now I’m on a search for a better voice program.
So while I do my very best to make my books error free, I hope you’ll forgive any small ones, or at least let me know so I can fix the e-books.















I find many of my books from many author’s have errors in them but I just ignore them and keep enjoying them books.
Much the best way to read, I think. I do the same, unless the mistakes are too frequent, or reveal some deep ignorance about the period or the setting.
Good proofreaders are so important! We used them where I worked and I always appreciated them. You’re so right about trying to proofread your own work: you see what you want to see and miss mistakes.
I don’t recall seeing any typos or missed punctuation in A Bride for Marcus, but it has been a while and obviously I just glided right over them. It does pull you out of the story a little when you see something wrong or missing.
Thanks, Karen. I suppose it depends on the mistake, whether it pulls you out of the story or not. I don’t think a missing full stop (period) or a small typo would do it for me. Lots of mistakes or some big misunderstanding about the period might do it for me.
It’s so hard to see your own mistakes. You are so right you often read what you thought you wrote not what actually was typed.
I enjoy your books so much I do not care about any errors. I appreciate your creativity and story telling!
Thanks so much, Katharine. I appreciate your kindness :)
My niece has worked as a line editor. It’s hard work.
I wonder if a person could give a page each to a college writing class, correct, reprint, and give everyone a different page! I re-read books, and notice different errors…. some that definitely weren’t there the first time or maybe the second. I wonder sometimes if AI isn’t correcting according to its code.
It is hard work. When I used to get printed manuscripts to check over (from my publisher, before they changed to emailing them), I had to use a ruler to hold under every line to make myself read every word. I don’t use AI in any part of my books — people have been slammed and publishers have dropped them, even though some of the authors have claimed they just used it for grammar and spelling. I don’t even trust the grammar advice Word gives you — several of their suggestions were so badly wrong it convinced me never to… Read more »
If you outsource your copyediting again you can insist they turn “on” the MS-Word feature “Track changes” so they don’t have to tell you what they fixed, you can easily review the changes they made and approve (or not!). How irritating.
Thanks, Annie, yes I know that. It’s how copyediting worked when I was with Berkley for 20 years. So, I clearly specified that she had to use track changes for every change she suggested or comment she wanted to make. She didn’t. She changed things, I presume hoping I wouldn’t notice. But I did, and was really annoyed.
Thank you for this post Anne. I found it quite an interesting insight. I only purchase paper-based copies of your work, but in future am happy to pass on any typos that I find so that you can update your electronic versions. Love your writing. Jo-Ann
Thanks, Jo-Ann — much appreciated.