The more things change . . .
How could the experience of English officers in Egypt in the early 1800s have any relevance to the situation today?
Read on . . . So many people think history is a quaint indulgence, but really, there is so much it can teach us about now. For instance, when I was researching travel in Egypt in the early 1800s, it was a surprise to me that Plague was a regular occurrence there — yes The Plague — bubonic plague, The Black Death — the same disease that killed 50 million people in the 14th century.
At that time, in Europe (specifically England, because that’s where part of my book was set) they didn’t know about germ theory, and how diseases were transferred. The question of whether the Plague was contagious or not polarized the medical profession into two camps —contagionists and anti-contagionists — and was hotly debated, even in Parliament. These reports are from Hansard (the official UK parliamentary record) here and evidence was given by people who had encountered the plague in Egypt. (I have used bold for some of the more interesting conclusions.)
Mr. Trant said: The plague prevailed at Alexandria while he was there. A surgeon with whom he was acquainted disbelieved the theory of contagion, and went among the patients in the hospital. He did not then take the infection, but wishing to push his experiments to the utmost, he got into a bed which had been occupied by one who had the infection. He did then become infected, and he died in consequence. General opinion, however, attributed the disease to atmospheric influence.
Sir Robert Wilson said that when he went to Egypt, the impression on his mind was, that the plague was contagious; but he was soon satisfied of the contrary. When he was in Egypt, the army formed two divisions. The one which was stationed at Alexandria took the plague; the other, which was generally in motion, was not touched with it. The difference was attributed to atmospheric influence.
The Turks* had no hesitation in entering the infected places. The bodies of those who died of the plague were buried in their clothes, and were generally dug up and stripped by those who had less fear of the consequences. The moving division of the British army passed through villages infected with the plague, without being touched with it…
It appeared to be one of the extraordinary phenomena of this disease, that persons who remained stationary were liable to it, and that those who passed rapidly through various currents of air escaped it.
(*At the time Egypt was part of the Ottoman Empire, hence the use of the word “Turks”)
However some historians have suggested that much of the medical fraternity’s conversion to anti-contagionism was less a result of medical conviction and more a desire to oppose “expensive, arbitrary and draconian” quarantine measures that hampered trade. Doctors declared yellow fever, the plague, and cholera — the main diseases affected by quarantines — to be non-contagious. Other diseases were less controversial
So interesting that medical opinion was prepared to bow to economic advantage, and the desire to free up trade overruled the safety of ordinary people. And how the value of medical “knowledge” was decided in parliament. The more things change . . .
