|








|
This
is the first article about Voice:
Voice
(part 1)
Whether
you're a writer of contemporaries, historicals, fantasy, or crime, the
"flavour" you present in your books can make or break you as
a writer. I'm talking about voice, I'm talking about style, I'm talking
about the way you see the world and the world you build in your books.
You won't stand out from the slush pile by being the same as everyone
else.
No editor is going to leap from their bath, shrieking "Eureka
-- I've found someone who writes just like Marion Lennox! Or Stephanie
Laurens. Or whoever."
It's like chocolate. There's no point inventing Cherry Ripe or Mars Bars
again, because we already have Cherry Ripe and Mars Bars. We want something
just as good -- only different. And that's what publishers want -- something
just as good, only different.
Would any of us seriously argue that there's already enough chocolate
in the world? Of course not -- there's always room for more good chocolate,
as there is for more good romance.
So how can you develop your own brand of choc-- er romance?
By discovering the "you" in your writing, by using your own
experiences, our own sensory differences, by tapping into small moments
into your own life, you can bring a sharpness and individuality to your
writing that will make it stand out from the pack.
You bring to your writing a particular view of the world, shaped by your
values, your experiences, your aesthetic tastes, your sense of humour.
When you write, in a sense, you invite the reader to share your world
-- and it is your skill of writing which will make that sharing an intense
one.
Believe in your way of seeing the world
A
friend of mine used to teach ceramics in an all-boys school. It was a
new subject and she was a new young teacher and she had to work very hard
to teach the boys that there was more to this "sissy" subject
than making clay pellets to flick or throw. One day, in desperation, she
conceived a project designed to make the boys really see.
The art room had big old-fashioned windows looking out to the front of
the school, through trees to the houses on the hill across the road. Each
window was divided into 16 panes. The boys' assignment was for each of
them to take one window pane and make a ceramic plaque of it. The plaques
had to be the same size as the window panes and they all had to fit together
at the end.
This
got the boys interested -- for a start, their measurements had to be accurate
to fit together, which they respected. As the work progressed, they wrestled
with scale and proportion, trying to get their part of the trees and houses
etc. right, so not only would it look like part of a tree and houses,
but would fit with the adjoining plaques. Some boys initially worried
because the inside of their plaque didn't look the same as other people's,
but my friend reassured them, saying the difference was fine: the only
rule was that the boundaries had to join accurately.
The boys became more and more absorbed. Nobody bothered with pellets any
more. Some even came in at lunchtime and after school to work on the plaques.
When the finished plaques were placed together, the result was astonishing.
Every plaque had been painstakingly rendered; they joined together perfectly.
Each plaque was an accurate rendition of the view from that pane of glass.
And yet each plaque was utterly unique. The choices in texture, shaping,
colour, the amount and style of detail in each reflected the unique perspective
of the individual boy artists. In one, the tree branch was flat and thick
and crude and bisected a very detailed scene of the houses behind like
an intrusive overlay. The same branch was picked up in the adjoining plaque,
only in this one the texture of the bark and leaves had been lovingly
recreated with every twist and ridge and imperfection, leaves thinned
almost to translucency, ready to flutter in the breeze. There were even
tiny insects marching across it. The houses behind were stylized and blank.
It was a most beautiful creation. The differences in the plaques was what
made the assembled piece so vibrant and so fascinating. And the
whole was greater than the sum of the parts;
It was a marvellous celebration of "voice" and I've never forgotten
it.
We each have our own pane of glass to look through.
***************
To
read the second article on "voice" click here.
|
 |